adam liptakĪnd they told me that they have long been living under a 1976 law that requires them to take federal observers out with them on their fishing trips. bill brightīut I’m probably not wiser, though. adam liptakĬan I ask you how old you are? bill bright

I actually quit my union job to try fishing, and I’ve been fishing ever since. Well, I’m actually a first-generation fisherman. And among the people I talked to was a fisherman named Bill Bright. So this case is about herring fishermen in Cape May, New Jersey. So Adam, remind us of the essential facts of this case that just ended up before the Supreme Court a few days ago, a case that I know you see as among the most important and consequential of this Supreme Court term. It’s Friday, January 19.Īdam, welcome back to the show. In reality, it could transform how every industry in the country is regulated. This week, the Supreme Court heard a case that, on its surface, appears to be a routine dispute over a government fee. michael barbaroįrom “New York Times,” I’m Michael Barbaro. Please review the episode audio before quoting from this transcript and email with any questions. While it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it may contain errors. This transcript was created using speech recognition software. Transcript The Fishermen Who Could End Federal Regulation as We Know It The Supreme Court is to decide whether to overturn a key precedent on the power of executive agencies.

Chelsea from wild child band